|
|

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) | Food Quality &
Safety
|
| 01 |
Does each entry on HACCP-generated records have to
be signed and dated? |
| 02 |
What corrective actions meet CFR 417.3 for zero tolerance
when fecal contamination is found? |
| 03 |
If the establishment has slaughter and only simple
processing, is it necessary to have more than one plan?
|
| 04 |
What is the appropriate appeal process for industry?
|
| 05 |
Who at our plant is required to receive HACCP training
in order to develop our plan and what requirements of
the final rule need to be fulfilled? |
| 06 |
Can pre-shipment review be performed on a continuous
basis? |
| 07 |
Can FSIS inspection personnel require CCPs even when
the establishment has performed a hazard analysis and
it reveals no food safety hazard that is reasonably likely
to occur? |
| 08 |
When is Nutrition labeling required? |
| 09 |
What are FDA requirements regarding Nutrient Content
Claims? |
| 10 |
What are FDA requirements for Food Additives? |
|
|
| 1 |
Does each entry on HACCP-generated records have to
be signed and dated?
CFR
417.5(b) states: Each entry on a record maintained under
the HACCP plan shall be made at the time the specific
event occurs and include the date and time recorded,
and shall be signed or initialed by the establishment
employee making the entry.
CFR
417.5(c) states that prior to shipping product, the
establishment shall review the records associated with
the production of that product to ensure that all critical
limits were met and, if appropriate, corrective actions
were taken, including the proper disposition of product.
Where practicable, this review shall be conducted, dated,
and signed by an individual who did not produce the
record(s).
back to top
|
|
|
| 2 |
What
corrective actions meet CFR 417.3 for zero tolerance
when fecal contamination is found?
All
of the product back to the last acceptable check must
be held. According to 417.3(a), the cause of the deviation
must be identified and eliminated. The CCP must be under
control after the corrective action is taken. Measures
must be taken to prevent recurrence and to ensure no
product that is injurious to health enters commerce.
This
means that all products after the last acceptable fecal
check is considered potentially contaminated and the
establishment must take actions to assure that the contaminated
product does not enter commerce. Such product should
be free of visible feces and the cross contamination
issue should be addressed.
|
|
|
| 3 |
If
the establishment has slaughter and only simple processing,
is it necessary to have more than one plan?
No,
it is not necessary. It is acceptable for slaughter
and simple processing to be covered with the same plan.
It is also considered acceptable for these to be covered
by separate plans.
back to top
|
|
|
| 4 |
What is the appropriate appeal process for industry?
If
the establishment disagrees with inspection personnel's
decisions, the decision can be appealed through the
chain of command. That is, Inspector In Charge (IIC),
Circuit Supervisor, District Office, and Headquarters.
back to top
|
|
|
| 5 |
Who at our plant
is required to receive HACCP training in order to develop
our plan and what requirements of the final rule need
to be fulfilled?
Only one individual requires HACCP training to develop
your plan. As stated in CFR 417.7 the individual must
successfully complete a course of instruction in the
application of the seven HACCP principles in meat or
poultry processing, including a segment on the development
of a HACCP plan for a specific product and on record
review. An individual that is HACCP trained but not
an employee of your establishment can also help create
your plan.
back to top
|
|
|
| 6 |
Can pre-shipment review be performed
on a continuous basis?
Pre-shipment review can be performed on a continuous
basis as long as the regulatory requirements are met
for the pre-shipment review. CFR 417.5(c) states that
prior to shipping product, the establishment shall review
the records associated with the production of that product
to ensure completeness, including the determination
that all critical limits are met and, if appropriate,
corrective actions are taken, including the proper disposition
of product.
back to top
|
|
|
| 7 |
Can
FSIS inspection personnel require CCPs even when the
establishment has performed a hazard analysis and it
reveals no food safety hazard that is reasonably likely
to occur?
FSIS inspection personnel are not to require CCPs. CCPs
are to be determined by the hazard analysis. As noted
in the Pathogen Reduction and HACCP rule CFR 417.2 a
food safety hazard that is reasonably likely to occur
is one for which a prudent establishment would establish
controls because it historically has occurred; or because
there is a reasonable possibility that it will occur
in the particular type of product being processed, in
the absence of those controls. Questions about whether
or not a CCP is needed should be addressed to the District
Office.
|
|
|
| 8 |
When is Nutrition labeling required?
The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (NLEA)
became law on November 8, 1990 and has led to significant
changes in food labeling regulations. These regulations
address three primary areas: the nutrition label, nutrient
content claims, and health claims.
The new nutrition labeling regulations in 21 CFR 101.9
require nutrition labels on almost all packaged foods,
revise the list of nutrients whose content levels are
required to be shown on the nutrition label, adopt a
new format for the nutrition label, and provide for
more consistent serving sizes across product lines to
reflect the amounts people actually eat. The basic nutrition
label is to list 14 nutrients. The nutrients and the
order in which they must be listed are: calories, calories
from fat, total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium,
total carbohydrate, dietary fiber, sugars, protein,
vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, and iron. Other vitamins
and minerals for which Reference Daily Intakes (RDI's)
have been established must be declared if a claim is
made about them or if they have been added as a nutrient
supplement.
In addition to these mandatory nutrients, manufacturers
may voluntarily choose to include calories from saturated
fat, and amounts of polyunsaturated fat, monounsaturated
fat, potassium, soluble fiber, insoluble fiber, sugar
alcohol, other carbohydrates, other vitamins and minerals
for which RDIs have been established, and beta-carotene
(as a percent of vitamin A). The amounts of nutrients
declared in nutrition labels are for the product in
the package, before consumer preparation. However, when
foods are not intended to be consumed as packaged, manufacturers
are encouraged to add another column of information
specifying the percent Daily Value of a serving of the
food "as consumed."
back to top
|
|
|
| 9 |
What are FDA requirements regarding Nutrient Content
Claims?
Nutrient
content claims are those claims that describe the amount
of a nutrient in the food (such as "sodium free" or
"low fat"). These claims may not be made unless they
are defined by FDA in regulations. General provisions
for the use of nutrient content claims have been established
in 21 CFR 101.13. Specific regulations have been issued
that define the use of the terms "good source," "high,"
and "more" (21 CFR 101.54) and the terms "light" or
"lite" (21 CFR 101.56). Separate regulations also cover
the use of nutrient content claims for caloric content
(21 CFR 101.60); sodium content (21 CFR 101.61); and
fat, fatty acid, and cholesterol content (21 CFR 101.62).
Various synonyms have also been established for the
basic terms. Persons considering using nutrient content
claims on the label or labeling of their products should
refer to the above regulations for details on the requirements.
back to top
|
|
|
| 10 |
What are FDA requirements
for Food Additives?
"Food additives" are substances which may by their intended
uses become components of food, either directly or indirectly,
or which may otherwise affect the characteristics of
the food. The term specifically includes any substance
intended for use in producing, manufacturing, packing,
processing, preparing, treating, packaging, transporting,
or holding the food, and any source of radiation intended
for any such use under Sec. 201(s).
But the law excludes from the definition of a "food additive":
- Substances generally recognized as safe by qualified
experts.
- Substances used in accordance with a previous approval
("prior sanction") under either the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Poultry Products Inspection
Act (21 U.S.C. 451) or the Federal Meat Inspection
Act (21 U.S.C. 601).
- Pesticide chemicals in or on raw agricultural products.
- Color
additives.
- New
animal drugs.
(Note: pesticide chemicals, color additives, and new
animal drugs are subject to similar safety requirements
of other sections of the law).
Manufacturers or importers not certain whether the chemicals
or other ingredients used in their foods are subject
to the safety clearance requirements of the Federal
Food Drug Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) may seek an opinion from
the Food and Drug Administration. If premarket approval
is required, this may mean that studies, including animal
feeding tests, will have to be carried out in accordance
with recognized scientific procedures, and the results
submitted to the Food and Drug Administration for evaluation.
General principles for evaluating the safety of food
additives are published in 21 CFR 170.20. General instructions
for preparing a food additive petition are in 21 CFR
171.
back to top
|
|
|
|